MARRIAGE WON AND THEY ARE POUTING

In response to a the recent upholding of the California same-sex "marriage" ban,
an article was written by (of course) a San Francisco author:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2009/05/27/notes052709.DTL&tsp=1

In arguing that the left should shrug off Prop 8, he imagines that even second graders would
not oppose homosexual "marriage."

The author writes,

“It’s an undeniable shame indeed that this powerful, iconic, world-altering state couldn’t get its damnable act together on The Last Civil Right.”

Does anyone believe that this is the last civil right?

They define themselves politically by expanding rights.
They don’t know the ‘60s are over.

The polygamy movement is already gearing up!

The author writes,

“Hate and homophobia still seethe in myriad pockets of the culture and the populace at large, even trickling down to dumb-blond silicon-injected beauty pageant runner-ups who parrot the same childlike religious misinformation her handlers have pumped into her kind for 2,000 wickedly patriarchal years.”

Of course the author doesn’t believe Miss California is
intelligent and thoughtful enough to have a legitimate
opinion on the homosexual “marriage” argument.

The reason she is only mouthing the line of thought
passed down to her? It’s because she dares to disagree.

In response to a the recent upholding of the California same-sex "marriage" ban,
an article was written by (of course) a San Francisco author:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2009/05/27/notes052709.DTL&tsp=1

In arguing that the left should shrug off Prop 8, he imagines that even second graders would
not oppose homosexual "marriage."

The author writes,

“Don’t they know the musty ol’ Bible mutters some barely coherent, mistranslated silliness about it in a single word or two written 1,500 years ago in a long dead language by acidic church elders with powermad political agendas and violently repressed libidos who nevertheless wish to instruct us all how to live and love and screw?”

Wow.

Talk about someone with latent passive-aggressive tendencies !!

We who actually read the Bible see how relevant it is
today.

The quote from the article shows how the author WISHES
that second graders thought about the Bible!

The author writes,

“Please note the response. Please observe how the kids merely look at you as though you’re more than a little bit deranged and prehistoric, so out of touch you might as well be Dick Cheney talking up the diesel-powered rectal thermometers he so loved back in World War I.”

Again, the author has written his own agenda onto what he
THINKS elementary school children would ponder.

Also, again, I wonder whether he actually believes that
he is “shrugging” about the CA Supreme Court upholding the
homosexual “marriage” ban.

From his reference to Cheney’s rectum, it sound as if he
is not at all happy about the Court’s decision after all.

Good!

The author writes,

“...this creepy elder just tried to convince them that the harmless, yawningly commonplace homosexuality currently saturating the popular culture all around them, from fashion to Facebook, movies to “American Idol,” is not only wrong, but so wrong that the law should ban it forever...”

Another straw man from the left.

He actually believes that Prop-8 supporters want to ban
homosexuality !!

He is angry, despite his “shrug” argument.

The author writes,

“...and our southern half is packed to the Orange County rafters with piles of aging social conservatives and religious zealots with far too little spiritual/sexual awareness and far too much money.”

We must remember that the social left conflates sexuality and spiritual totality, as the “spiritual/sexual” comment shows.

They’ve had sexual experiences, understood that sex is
also spiritual, and they stopped trying to find God there.

“Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is on earthly things.” ~ Philippians 3:19

and

“”Food for the stomach and the stomach for food”—but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.”
~ 1 Corinthians 6:13

Sex is great, but it needs to be in its place, just as
morphine is good for a victim of a terrible car accident,
but when morphine is used “recreationally” it is bad.

Sex that is not done at least in part for an opposite-sex
spouse is little more than masturbation. It does not build,
but destroys. Sex is meant to bring husband and wife
closer together. God has a purpose for everything.

But this argument is lost on the left because they don’t
want God telling them what to do, even if it’s for their
own benefit.

They’re like spoiled, bratty little children.

WE WIN -- CA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The famous pro-homosexual "marriage" argument goes:
"There is no down side to expanding rights in this way."

Wrong.

When rights are given, other rights are removed, such
as the right of parents to teach that homosexuality is wrong.

This kind of normalization of homosexuality is really what
our opposition is after. Therefore, they should just ask us
to think of them as normal. Don't change a basic societal
institution to accomplish normalization. That way we can
choose to accept or not, and our rights are not diminished.

Talk about a win-win!

The Bravest Contestant of All

"Shocking" pictures are being used by the USA Pageant to pressure Carrie Prejean to step down. How unfortunate.Miss Rhode Island did similar pictures, but no pressure. Those who are against traditional morality in society will say, "You're just sticking up for a Christian." No. This is not about Christianity, or even the Pageant. This is about speech. The militant homosexual movement wants to shut down debate. Hypocritical actions are ok for that side as long as it is against the so-called hate (which for them is always the pro-traditional marriage perspective, which is also far from the truth.) To prove the point: imagine a person for homosexual unions being called vicious names in the media. Where would the "feminists" and other assorted leftists stand on these attacks? The verbal attacker would be called right-wing Nazi and many more names, which the left is still doing to Miss CA. Who really are the fascists in this Miss California incident?

Homophobe? The precise definition is someone who is afraid of homosexuals. If you want to have a discussion, please keep labeling out of it unless you can provide absolute proof that she is afraid of homosexuals. For many in the militant homosexual movement, it's about making homosexuality a normal, accepted part of society. For those on the other side, it's about maintaining a traditional definition of marriage in society. There is much evidence already that the next group after homosexuals will want to be accepted. The polygamists are already pushing for acceptance. This is not about homosexuality; it's about marriage. You can't force someone to accept homosexuality. This is not about Miss California. This is not about her morals. It's not brave to make a statement for the cause of homosexual unions. As the extreme reaction to Miss CA's opinion shows, it's brave to stand up for traditional marriage.

Society is not made better by extending more rights in every case. We don't even properly use all the rights we already have. The militant movement doesn't even yet use the right of speech properly yet. They want society to believe they deserve the right of marriage now?

In some posts, a participant called Miss California a"slutty hypocrite." You see, the enemies of values and ethics want not to discuss the issues, but to attack anyone who disagrees with them. They think that if enough pressure is put on us, we will be too frightened to speak out. We need to stand up for brave people like Carrie Prejean. She makes us want to speak out wherever we can. The worst that can happen is that we are called similar names.

When this happens, reasonable people from the sidelines will understand which is the side of true
justice. The others will be exposed because "by their fruits you will know them."

Pro-US is a Good Thing

It was stunning to see pro-US and anti-socialism protesters
in such great numbers. Most were protesters for the first
time.

We need to continue to protest to show our strength.
This will accomplish two things. First, it will allow people
on the sidelines to begin to say, “Maybe I actually have
been indoctrinated by the leftist establishment, and maybe,
because I also believe in what these people believe, I too
am a pro-American, small-government conservative.”

Second, the elitist media will become even more exposed
as a completely biased, pro-candidate propaganda tool.
This election was won by the media. Busy conservatives
didn’t even get a chance to see the real Obama.

Please continue to push for protests. The online stuff is
good, but when you are out there at a rally, we and they
can see our numbers and enthusiasm with their eyes.

Behind the "need" to help "those who can't
help themselves" is a message:
"you can't help yourself." "You can't help
yourself" because you are nothing but a slightly
more evolved animal. So feel free to live a life
free from moral compunction. The result is slavery
for the individual trapped in addictions and all-around
bad behaviors. "You can't help yourself" when you want
to get ahead in life. "The system" is stacked against
you, and all you can do is look to the government to
right all the wrongs in "the system" instead of lifting
yourself up by your bootstraps. What's in it for
the leftist politicians perpetuating the lies to the
American people? Answer: vast numbers
of Americans who will become dependent on them
and keep these cynical politicians in power for
generations.

The Vietnamese who came to San Jose are staunchly
pro-American. Almost all of them represent a story
of a person or a family who never looked to the
government to pay their bills. They came with nothing
and they worked and worked and worked. They started
businesses. They raised families. They did amazing
things without looking for a bailout or a stimulus
package.

We will start a conservative revolution that will
keep the United States from sliding into European
socialism. The more generations your family has
been in the US or Western Europe, the more spoiled,
lazy and socialist you become. It's a disease that
can only be overcome by hard work by all of us.
Barack Obama and the leftist power grab that is about
to pass the Senate is a wake up call.

This is why the media hated Sarah Palin so much during her campaign to be Vice President:
she didn't go to schools that inculcate their students with
an ivory-tower sense of their graduates' being the cream of
society's crop. She represents the fact that average person can
legitimately gain political power through the democratic process
and so deflates elitism among the elite.

I think there is another reason. Big Media makes billions
selling to the most base desires in the human psyche: illicit sex,
instant gratification, becoming rich without effort, etc.

Big Media's partner is The Left, which wants the masses to insist
that the government do everything for them (no-effort success),
achieve "liberation" through anything-goes sexuality (illicit
sex) and to never have remorse or self-reflection (no self-
discipline). In this way, The Left creates a permanent
underclass whom they can manipulate at will.

Big Media and The Left want the masses to fit
into their "scientific" belief that people are merely
slightly more evolved animals. To put forth the view
that humans are the crowning achievement in God's creation
would upset their cash cow and, for The Left, their
means of achieving domination in society. Animals
cannot be held morally responsible for what they do.

So Palin represents a break from their plan: she's a
woman (with no victim mentality) who models a way
for regular folks to achieve power for the purpose,
in part, of telling the truth: that Big Media's
product is pure dreck and that more government
represents less freedom. The United States fought
a valiant and noble war of independence against
unrepresentative government in the late 18th century.
It's time to do it again.

Not Friends, No Benefits

There is a college "ethic" that encourages "friends with benefits." During sex, women tend to bond more than men do with their mate. When the "friends with benefits" relationship ages, the co-ed is left without a friend (he has become more whether she sees it or not) and with no benefits (the sex no longer thrills because she realizes she is being used). The incoming co-eds are not called freshmen; they are called "fresh meat" by the young men that used to be protective of the purity of their new co-eds. How liberating.

Homosexual Agenda and the Leftist Worldview

If you believe in the concept of original sin, then even a person’s being born a certain way doesn’t mean that the behavior that the person is born inclined to do should be legally protected. For instance, I believe that many people are born with a temper that is “quicker” than others. If these people now tend to get irritated quickly with their spouses, should we legally protect their right to emotionally badger their husbands or wives? Of course not.

So even if there is a genetic tendency towards homosexuality, the only question is, Should the institution of marriage be redefined because of it? What about the pedophile who was “born” with an attraction to children. In the eyes of the law, no one with such an attraction can be put in jail unless he or she acts out upon this attraction. Therefore, we need a source to inform us what kinds of actions are right and which are wrong. If the Bible is no longer our source (the specious “living document” argument), then we are left to rely on our feelings.

The world is divided into two types of people: those that believe behavior should be guided by a higher authority who is outside themselves and those that believe we should look within for this guidance. Liberals are in the latter camp, which is becoming the dominant worldview in industrialized countries. The say, “Search your heart for what is right and wrong and do whatever your inner person tells you to do.” The Columbine shooters, among many others, were raised in such a worldview. The liberals think that to believe in a higher moral authority is dangerous because the “Church’s history” is replete with examples of periods in which masses of believers were duped into engaging in all manner of atrocities against their fellow men. So the Spanish Inquisition is a great point of proof of this for the Left. Meanwhile they ignore the holocaust against unborn babies that dwarfs the damage done merely in the name of religion.

In this light, the homosexual agenda is at its core the demand that society stop looking for moral absolutes. This is intended to free us to do what we believe to be right. Somehow, doing what your heart tells you to do is liberating. As the noted Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias says, There is a difference between autonomy and freedom. Unfettered autonomy can obliterate actual freedom, such as the right of life for the unborn. We are in a civil war of ideas that has and will increasingly have a massive affect on the way we live our lives.

There is not enough of an outrage against the homosexual movement. Unless we act now, we as a society will be pushed even further from our moral bearings. We did nothing when prayer was taken out of school, and if we do not push back against the homosexual agenda, our children will grow up believing that homosexuality is a legitimate expression of love. True biblical love will be even further from our children’s minds.

Homosexuals can, and should, cease from engaging in homosexual activity, just as those that feel an attraction to children should not act out on their feelings. What we do, or don’t do, will affect the moral tone of society ten years hence and of the generations to come.

http://www.meetup.com/counter-protest-prop-8
http://savecalifornia.com/
http://www.nationformarriage.org/

Let’s get involved.